USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Enbridge Spill near Marshall, MI

On July 26, 2010, the Enbridge control center in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada discovered a crude oil leak from Line 6B. This 30 inch diameter pipeline is part of the Lakehead System  transporting crude oil and liquid petroleum products from Griffith, Indiana to Sarnia, Ontario, Canada. PHMSA and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) conducted an investigation.

Lakehead System Overview

Enbridge Energy Partners, headquartered in Houston, TX, transports crude oil, liquid petroleum, and natural gas in the Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast regions of the United States. The 4,700 mile Lakehead System transports crude oil through Canada and the upper Midwestern US. The 1,900 mile US portion of the Lakehead System includes Line 6B.

  • Lakehead System Map

Enbridge Report of Spill

On July 26, 2010, the Enbridge control center in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada discovered a crude oil leak from Line 6B at 9:45 am local time, 11:45 am eastern daylight time. This 30 inch diameter pipeline transports crude oil and liquid petroleum products from Griffith, Indiana to Sarnia, Ontario, Canada. Enbridge reported the leak to the National Response Center at 1:33 pm eastern daylight time and estimated the spill volume at 19,500 barrels, equivalent to 819,000 gallons. At the time of the report, spilled crude oil had flowed through Talmedge Creek to the Kalamazoo River.

  • Calhoun County Map
  • NRC Report 948903

Emergency Response

Image of a stream of murky water

Enbridge isolated the leak by closing mainline valves upstream and downstream from the spill site to limit the volume of crude oil that could potentially leak from the pipeline. Oil containment booms were deployed on both Talmedge Creek and the Kalamazoo River. Also, Enbridge excavated the spill site to extract the oil as it leaked from the pipe. The federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) directed and monitored all aspects of oil spill cleanup and containment efforts for over 30 miles of the Kalamazoo River. While the emergency response phase has ended, clean-up of the contaminated landscape is ongoing.

PHMSA Corrective Action Order

On July 28, PHMSA issued a Corrective Action Order (CAO) to Enbridge requiring the operator to take specific steps to ensure the safety of the pipeline before the agency will allow the line to return to service. The CAO required Enbridge to submit a return to service plan providing procedures for repairs and monitoring the pipeline if it is allowed to resume service. The CAO also required Enbridge to submit an integrity verification plan including a comprehensive review of the operating history of Line 6B and prescribe further inspections, testing, and repairs within and beyond the immediate failure area. On September 17, PHMSA proposed an amendment to the CAO summarizing integrity information gained since the spill and setting out expectations for repair of known defects and the collection of additional integrity data. Enbridge agreed to the proposed CAO amendment and PHMSA issued a Final CAO on September 22.

  • Corrective Action Order
  • Notice of Proposed Amendment to the Corrective Action Order
  • Final Corrective Action Order

Enbridge Integrity Confirmation

Coating steel pipelines

On August 9, 2010, Enbridge requested permission from PHMSA to restart Line 6B. On August 10, 2010, PHMSA denied the request, finding that the restart plan did not adequately provide for the safe restart of the pipeline. In addition to requesting more details about the restart plan, PHMSA refused to approve any future restart plan that did not include at least four investigative excavations and a hydrostatic pressure test. Enbridge reviewed inspection

Line 6B Restart

On September 21, Enbridge submitted a revised restart plan for Line 6B to PHMSA. Enbridge proposed to notify local emergency responders prior to restart, raise the pressure in increments with patrolling after each increment, and hire a third-party contractor to monitor the restart. On September 22, 2010, PHMSA approved the restart plan, allowing Enbridge to begin preparations for restart. After ensuring Enbridge complied with the preparation portion of the restart plan, PHMSA authorized Enbridge to resume the operation of Line 6B on September 26. The Line 6B restart plan was completed on September 28 and Enbridge may operate the pipeline subject to the pressure restrictions in the PHMSA CAO.

  • Enbridge Restart Plan
  • PHMSA Approval of Plan
  • PHMSA Press Release
  • Enbridge Request to Resume Operation
  • PHMSA Authorization to Resume Operation

Integrity Verification Plan

On September 26, 2010, Enbridge submitted an Integrity Verification Plan (IVP) to PHMSA. This plan incorporates all of the information learned since the spill. By integrating the results of metallurgical testing, assessment records, and repair history, Enbridge has developed a schedule for the additional integrity assessments and repairs required by the CAO. On November 1, PHMSA responded to the integrity verification plan with an expectation that Enbridge will include hydrostatic pressure testing and pipe replacement in the long term integrity plan. On March 18, 2011, PHMSA directed Enbridge to submit a revised IVP by April 15 and Enbridge has submitted a revision. On May 26, 2011, Enbridge announced plans to replace 75 miles of Line 6B in Michigan and Indiana.

  • Line 6B Integrity Verification Plan
  • PHMSA Response to Integrity Plan
  • PHMSA Directive for IVP Revision
  • Enbridge April 15, 2011 IVP Revision
  • Enbridge Pipe Replacement Plan