Interpretation Response #99-0054 ([Ten-E Packaging Services, Inc.] [Mr. Robert J. Ten Eyck])
Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.
Interpretation Response Details
Response Publish Date:
Company Name: Ten-E Packaging Services, Inc.
Individual Name: Mr. Robert J. Ten Eyck
Location State: MN Country: US
View the Interpretation Document
Response text:
August 10, 1999
Mr. Robert J. Ten Eyck Ref No: 99-0054
Director, Technical Services
Ten-E Packaging Services, Inc.
1666 County Road 74
Newport, Minnesota 55055
Dear Mr. Ten Eyck:
This is in response to your letter of March 1, 1999, requesting clarification on the requirements for testing packagings under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR parts 17 1 180). Specifically you ask whether each closure for a packaging used under Variation 5 of § 172.601 (g) must be tested when the periodic design requalification is performed.
The answer is no. Nothing in the HMR requires testing of each different closure used under Variation 5.
I hope this information is helpful.
Sincerely,
Delmer F. Billings
Chief, Standards Development
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
178.601
Regulation Sections
| Section | Subject |
|---|---|
| 178.601 | General requirements |