USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Interpretation Response #25-0137

Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.

Interpretation Response Details

Response Publish Date:

Company Name: Public Utilities Commission of Ohio

Individual Name: Rod "Chip" Moser

Location State: OH Country: US

View the Interpretation Document

Response text:

September 24, 2026

Rod "Chip" Moser
Chief, Transportation Compliance/Registration
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
180 E Broad Street
Columbus, OH  43215

Reference No. 25-0137

Dear Mr. Moser:

This letter is in response to your October 8, 2025 email requesting clarification of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) on cargo tanks and the performance requirements to prevent accumulation of material impairing the operation of the pressure relief systems. Specifically, you ask about the applicability of § 178.345-10(b)(6) as it relates to pressure relief device (PRD) components.

We have paraphrased and answered your questions as follows:

Q1. What part of the pressure relief device, e.g., the "rain cap," does § 178.345-10(b)(6) apply to?

A1. Section § 178.345-10(b)(6) refers to the entire pressure relief system, rather than an individual PRD or an individual PRD component. Under § 178.345-10(b)(1), a primary pressure relief system consists of one or more reclosing pressure relief valves (devices), and a "rain cap" or cover may be either a component of the PRD or a separate element of the broader system.

Q2. Does missing an "upper housing hole plug" as part of a PRD as shown in the example schematic provided constitute a violation of § 178-345-10(b)(6)?

A2. The requirement found in § 178.345-10(b)(6) is intended to ensure the pressure relief system is "mounted, shielded and drainable" to minimize the accumulation of material that could impair its operation. Noncompliance is determined on a case-by-case basis, considering not only the cargo tank design, but also the conditions and environment in which the cargo tank will be in use. If the absence of a single component, such as a the one you describe, affects the operation or discharge capability of the pressure relief system—by the accumulation of material that allows freezing, corrosion, or blockage—it may result in non-compliance.

Q3. Is it a violation if the "rain cap" is in place but the rubber plug is missing?

A3. See answer A2.

I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.

Sincerely,

Dirk Der Kinderen
Chief, Standards and Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

Regulation Sections

Section Subject
178.345-10 Pressure relief