USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Interpretation Response #19-0027

Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.

Interpretation Response Details

Response Publish Date:

Company Name: Liewellyn (Safety Advisors) Europe Ltd.

Individual Name: Darren Edwards

Location State: Northamptonshire Country: GB

View the Interpretation Document

Response text:

May 31, 2019

Darren Edwards
Llewellyn (Safety Advisors) Europe Ltd.
Evelyn House Business Centre
38 Broad Green
NN8 4LH Wellingborough
Northamptonshire, England
 
Reference No. 19-0027

Dear Mr. Edwards:

This letter is in response to your January 7, 2019, email requesting clarification of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to intermediate bulk containers (IBCs). Specifically, you ask why the HMR do not limit the use of plastic IBCs to a five-year period, in accordance with the United Nations (UN) Model regulations. 

A final rule titled "Intermediate Bulk Containers for Hazardous Materials" published July 26, 1994 (HM-181E; 59 FR 38040), adopted requirements for the construction, maintenance, and use of IBCs based on standards outlined in the UN Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods — Model Regulations.  The Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA), the predecessor agency to PHMSA, received comments in opposition to the proposed five-year period of use (i.e., a five-year service life) for rigid plastic IBCs and plastic inner receptacles for composite IBCs. Additionally, another commenter indicated the action was inappropriate without input from industry regarding what constitutes a suitable service life for plastic IBCs consistent with the approach taken for plastic non-bulk packaging. RSPA agreed with the commenters and did not adopt the proposed five-year service life for plastic IBCs in the HMR.

I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.

Sincerely,

Dirk Der Kinderen
Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

Regulation Sections