Interpretation Response #PI-81-0103
Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.
Interpretation Response Details
Response Publish Date:
Company Name:
Individual Name:
Location State: NY Country: US
View the Interpretation Document
Response text:
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
United Engineering Center
345 E. 47th St.
New York, N.Y. 10017
April 24, 1981
Mr. William Gute
Petroleum Engineer
Pipeline Safety Enforcement Division
Office of Operations & Enforcement
Materials Transportation Bureau
Dept. of Transportation
Research and Special Program Admin.
SUBJECT: Inquiry 1453
Dear Mr. Gute:
Reference is made to your inquiry letter of February 5, 1980.
Our understanding of the question in your inquiry and our reply are as follows:
1. QUESTION:
What are the definitions of "designer",”special or unusual problem", and "rigorous analysis" as
mentioned in Paragraph 400 (e) of ANSI/ASME B31.4.
REPLY:
Designer. The responsible person who, by the use of his knowledge, training, expertise, and
experience, applies accepted engineering practice and criteria to arrive at the specific physical
combination of pipe, fittings, structures, and materials meeting the requirements of this Code.
Special or Unusual Problem. A problem relating to the general subject of this Code, but not
specifically covered by procedures or limitations detailed therein.
Rigorous Analysis. A comprehensive and detailed investigation and/or assessment of a subject where
specific rules are not given in the Code, or as a substitute for the simplified engineering
approach usually presented in the Code. When used, the designer is responsible for demonstrating
the validity of his approach.
2. QUESTION:
Is it the intent of Section 400 (e) of the B31.4 Code to allow pipeline operators to exceed flange
or valve designer/ manufacturer's maximum working pressure based on the operators own testing or
calculations?
REPLY:
ANSI/ASME B31.4 clearly states that when a designer/operator exceeds or deviates from the
requirements of the Code, based on a rigorous analysis, he alone is responsible for demonstrating
the
validity of his approach.
I trust the above comments have adequately answered your questions, and I shall consider the matter
closed unless I hear from you to the contrary.
Sincerely,
Jerry D’Acanzo
Secretary, B31
Regulation Sections
Section | Subject |
---|---|
195.406 | Maximum operating pressure |