USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Interpretation Response #PI-93-039 ([Airborne Environmental Surveys] [Dave Mitchel])

Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.

Interpretation Response Details

Response Publish Date:

Company Name: Airborne Environmental Surveys

Individual Name: Dave Mitchel

Location State: CA Country: US

View the Interpretation Document

Response text:

July 16, 1993 (?)

Mr. Dave Mitchel


Airborne Environmental Surveys

Suite 108

3130 Skyway Drive

Santa Maria, CA 93455

Dear Mr. Mitchel:

This responds to your letter of April 12, 1993, to George W. Tenley, Jr. regarding the use of airborne cathodic monitoring equipment to detect and measure the impressed cathodic currents in pipelines. Your letter states that your technology involves the determination of current and current density at any point on an impressed-current pipeline by direct measurement of electromagnetics, specifically the magnetic field associated with the impressed current. Your letter further states that these measurements may be made from ground surface, or from airborne platforms.

Properly applied, electromagnetic can yield continuous measurements and plots of current along a pipeline, including interference from foreign pipelines, bonds, taps, casing shorts, coupling separations, coating conductivity changes and holidays. It is very important that an existing baseline pipe-to-soil potential be established by conventional methods. The electromagnetic techniques can be employed to establish baseline data that can be overlaid on the original baseline pipe-to-soil to accurately portray the performance of the cathodic protection system. This technique would provide an approach to assess the performance of the cathodic protection system to determine compliance with the requirements of 49 CFR 192.463(a) and §192.465(b) and (c).

As set forth in my letter of November 7, 1991, an operator has the freedom to conduct its inspections utilizing whatever appropriate technology or means it chooses, including your airborne cathodic monitoring equipment, to comply with the inspections under 49 CFR 192.463(a) and §192.465(b) and (c) of rectifiers or other impressed current power source. If the airborne cathodic monitoring equipment provides reliable data, your airborne remote sensing technique is an acceptable means of inspection under the above rules.


Cesar De Leon

Director, Regulatory Programs

Office of Pipeline Safety

Regulation Sections

Section Subject
192.463 External corrosion control: Cathodic protection