USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Interpretation Response #PI-90-007 ([Heath and Associates] [Charles C. Heath])

Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.

Interpretation Response Details

Response Publish Date:

Company Name: Heath and Associates

Individual Name: Charles C. Heath

Location State: NC Country: US

View the Interpretation Document

Response text:

Mr. Charles C. Heath

Heath and Associates

P. O. Box 185

7 North Lafayette Street

Shelby, North Carolina 28150

Dear Mr. Heath:

You have requested our opinion whether a monitoring-type regulator station that includes a bypass line with a lockable valve meets the design requirements of 49 CFR Part 192. James Stites of the South Carolina Public Service Commission, anticipating your request, has sent us copies of correspondence with you related to an incident in which an individual opened such a by-pass line, causing a downstream main to rupture.

We have concluded from our review of applicable regulations that regulator stations designed as you have described are permissible under Part 192. Moreover, we do not believe that the intent of the regulations requires installation of a non-isolatable relief device in these stations to provide further protection against downstream overpressure. The purpose of the regulations that govern the control of pressure at regulator stations is to protect against accidental overpressure caused by failure of a piping component. The regulations are not intended to require the installation of hardware to guard against potential overpressure caused by human error, such as opening a bypass valve without regard for the consequences.

Our experience shows that in most cases the best regulatory approach to preventing pipeline accidents caused by human error involves requiring personnel to follow detailed operating and maintenance procedures and to undergo training and testing in those procedures. We have rulemaking proceedings underway in both areas.

Sincerely,

George W. Tenley, Jr.

Director

Office of Pipeline Safety

Regulation Sections

Section Subject
192.199 Requirements for design of pressure relief and limiting devices