USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Interpretation Response #PI-89-005 ([Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission] [Williams E. Smeigh, Jr.])

Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.

Interpretation Response Details

Response Publish Date:

Company Name: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Individual Name: Williams E. Smeigh, Jr.

Location State: PA Country: US

View the Interpretation Document

Response text:

May 17, 1989

Mr. Williams E. Smeigh, Jr.

Supervisor

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

P.O. Box 3265

Harrisburg, PA 17120

Dear Mr. Smeigh:

Your May 9, 1989, letter requests guidance as to the meaning of "feasible" under 49 CFR 192.365(b), which reads:

(b) Outside valves. Each service line must have a shut-off valve in a readily accessible location that, if feasible, is outside of the building.

Under Part 192, ordinary words, such as "feasible," that are not defined in §192.3 and do not have a special pipeline meaning are used as they are commonly understood by English speaking people in the U.S. In this sense, the word "feasible" means capable of being done or accomplished.

Given this understanding, we believe a situation would seldom occur in which it is not feasible to install a service line shut-off valve outside a building in a readily accessible location. Certainly, none of the excuses put forth in your letter allows an operator to avoid outside installation under §192.365(b). Outside installations by the other operators under your jurisdiction in similar situations should readily support this position.

Sincerely,

Richard L. Beam

Director

Office of Pipeline Safety

Regulation Sections