USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Interpretation Response #PI-82-012 ([Missouri Public Service Commission] [Dale W. Johansen])

Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.

Interpretation Response Details

Response Publish Date:

Company Name: Missouri Public Service Commission

Individual Name: Dale W. Johansen

Location State: MO Country: US

View the Interpretation Document

Response text:

Mr. Dale W. Johansen

Assistant Director, Gas Department

Engineering Section

Missouri Public Service Commission

P.O. Box 360

Jefferson City, Missouri 65102

Dear Mr. Johansen:

We regret the delay in answering your letter about a compliance issue involving the Laclede Gas Company.

As we understand your inquiry, it is whether Section 3(a)(1) of the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, as amended (49 USC 1672(a)(1)), permits retroactive application of the cathodic protection standards in Subpart I of Part 192 to pipeline facilities in existence when the standards were adopted.

Section 3(a)(1) provides that standards applying to emergency plans and procedures, extension, operation, replacement, maintenance, subsequent inspection, or subsequent testing may be applied to pipeline facilities in existence when the standards are adopted. With respect to existing facilities (installed before August 1, 1971), Subpart I requires the determination of areas of active corrosion and the application of cathodic protection to these areas and to any repaired or replaced areas, with subsequent inspection and testing to ascertain whether the cathodic protection is working properly. These requirements are examples of standards specifically permitted by Section 3(a)(1) for replacement, maintenance, inspection, and testing of existing pipeline facilities. They are not standards which would require modification of a pipeline's design to achieve compliance; and we agree that such standards would be forbidden by Section 3(a)(1).

Sincerely,

Melvin A. Judah

Acting Associate Director for

Pipeline Safety Regulation

Materials Transportation Bureau

Regulation Sections

Section Subject
192.457 External corrosion control: Buried or submerged pipelines installed before August 1, 1971