USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Interpretation Response #PI-82-0109

Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.

Interpretation Response Details

Response Publish Date:

Company Name:

Individual Name:

Location State: IA Country: US

View the Interpretation Document

Response text:

PI-82-0109

November 3, 1982

Mr. Tom Reifschneider
Peoples Engineering
Supervisor of Standards
Peoples Natural Gas Company

25 Main Place
Council Bluffs, IA 51501

Dear Mr. Reifschneider:

This responds to your letter of October 12, 1982, regarding the use of an encapsulation method to repair leaks in PVC fittings. You asked whether the method would qualify as a "patching saddle" under §192.311.

The enclosed copy of a letter dated February 27, 1981, to Keith Chen Discusses the meaning of "patching saddle." Based on that discussion, it appears that the encapsulation method does not qualify as a "patching saddle" in its ordinary sense.

We presume that your primary use of the method would be to repair existing pipelines in place. In this case, §192.311 would not apply since it only governs the construction of new transmission lines and mains or existing ones that are being relocated, replaced, or otherwise changed (see §§192.13 and 192.301). The only restrictions under Part 192 on use of the encapsulation method for repairing an existing plastic pipeline are the provisions in §192.703(b), which essentially require that the repair method used remit in a safe pipeline.

Sincerely,

Original signed by Richard L. Beam
Associate Director for
Pipeline Safety Regulation
Materials Transportation Bureau

February 27, 1981

Mr. Keith A. Chen, P.E.
Director - Research
Wisconsin Gas Company
£26 Last Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202

Dear Mr. Chen:

Your letter to this office of February 6, 1981, concerns the use of full encirclement stainless steel band clamps for permanent repair of damaged plastic pipe. We agree with your interpretation that Subpart G of 49 CFR Part 192 (and, thus, §192.311) is only applicable during the construction of a transmission line or main. However, as further discussed below, even if the band clamp were considered a “patching saddle,” as intended by §192.311 (which it is not), its use to permanently repair plastic pipe either during construction or after operation nay be pro­hibited under §192.703(b).

In regard to the term “patching saddle” as used in §192.311, these words were added to the final rule as a result of comments to the proposed rule stating that defective plastic pipe should be permitted to be repaired. These comments clearly had in mind the use of a saddle made of material similar to that of the pipe being repaired that would be joined to the pipe by fusion, solvent cement, adhesion, or similar methods. Typical comments that prompted the Office of Pipeline Safety to permit use of a “patching saddle” were

"We feel that patching of a plastic vain should be allowed. Should be no difference between a patch

over a gouge or the installation of a service tee." (Iowa Public Service Company)

"The use of solvent weld half-soles on polyvinyl chloride pipe has proven to be a safe, economical method of repair for scratches, gouges, and grooves on mains in service. (Central Telephone and Utilities Corporation)

Thus, a band clamp is inconsistent with the meaning intended by "patching saddle.

Another reason why "patching saddle" does not mean a band clamp is that when §192.311 was issued, §192.281(e)(2) was also issued, requiring a rigid internal tubular stiffener to be used in conjunction with each compression type mechanical coupling. This requirement recognizes the compressive forces of the sealing gasket used in a compression coupling and the fact that plastic materials under constant stress will tend to cold flow. A full encirclement stainless steel hand clamp, like a compression coupling, subjects the plastic pipe to compressive stress but does not provide internal support for the pipe that may be needed to prevent cold flow of the plastic.

Because of the question of cold flow of plastic pipe, we believe that the safety of a permanent repair by use of a band clamp is questionable under some conditions, depending on the stiffness of the elastic pipe involved. Where unsafe conditions would result, §192.703(b) would forbid use of the band clamp as a repair method.

In your letter, you state that “Wisconsin Gas conducted tests on tile, stainless steel clamp, used as a patching saddle which determined that the performance met the required safety and serviceability tests of the code." We would appreciate your sending us these data and any other data available on the problem of cold flow of plastic pipe under continuous gasket as discussed above.

Sincerely,

MELVIN A. JUDAH

Melvin A. Judah
Acting Associate Director for
Pipeline Safety Regulation
Materials Transportation Bureau

 

Regulation Sections

Section Subject
192.13 What general requirements apply to pipelines regulated under this part?