You are here

Interpretation Response #PI-73-007


Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.

Interpretation Response Details

Response Publish Date: 01-29-1973
Company Name: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission    Individual Name: Jerry Rich
Location state: PA    Country: US

View the Interpretation Document


Response text:

Mr. Jerry Rich
Director, Bureau of Investigations, Service and Enforcement
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
P. O. Box 3265
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120

Dear Mr. Rich:

This is in reference to your letter dated January 17, 1973, concerning a possible violation of Section 192.199(g), 49 CFR, by the Equitable Gas Company in its regulator station R. B.-26. The intent of Section 192.199(g) is to require gas operators to install pressure relief or pressure limiting devices in a manner to prevent any single incident such as an explosion in a vault or damage by a vehicle from affecting the operation of both the overpressure protective device and the district regulator. Therefore, the overpressure protective device and the district regulator must be sufficiently separated or adequately isolated from each other to prevent a single incident such as an explosion or damage by a vehicle from affecting the operation of both. Your letter indicates that the Commission believes that compliance with Section 192.199(g) was achieved by rebuilding the regulator station according to the proposed plan in Figure 3 in the National Transportation Safety Board Report Number NTSB-PAR-72-2. From the information contained in the report, the regulator and the overpressure protection device were to be less than 3 feet apart in the same vault.

It appears that a single incident such as an explosion in the vault would affect the operation of both; therefore, the proposed revamping of regulator station R.B.-26 as shown in Figure 3 of the NTSB report would not be in compliance with Section 192.199(g).

Based on the intent of Section 192.199(g), as stated above, would you please advise whether you believe Equitable Gas Company to be in compliance with Section 192.199(g); and, if so, in what manner the Company has achieved compliance with this regulation.

Your immediate attention to this matter will be greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,

Joseph C. Caldwell
Director
Office of Pipeline Safety


Regulation Sections

Section Subject
§ 192.199 Requirements for design of pressure relief and limiting devices