USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Interpretation Response #10-0251 ([PBI Technology, Inc.] [Mr. Paul Bess])

Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.

Interpretation Response Details

Response Publish Date:

Company Name: PBI Technology, Inc.

Individual Name: Mr. Paul Bess

Location State: TX Country: US

View the Interpretation Document

Response text:

May 7, 2012

 

Mr. Paul Bess
President
PBI Technology, Inc.
P.O. Box 58356
Webster, TX 77598

Ref. No. 10-0251

Dear Mr. Bess:

This responds to your letter requesting clarification of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to hazardous materials transportation functions performed by multiple parties. I apologize for the delay in responding and any inconvenience it may have caused. Your questions are paraphrased and answered as follows:

Q1. Through a contractual agreement with a manufacturing facility, a vendor assumes all responsibilities for regulated hazardous materials functions. As such, the vendor fills and delivers Intermediate Bulk Containers (IBCs), portable tanks, and cylinders, it either owns or leases, to a manufacturing facility using its own vehicles and personnel. Vendor personnel unload the packages and connect them to process equipment where they are consumed by the manufacturing facility. When empty, vendor personnel return to pick up the packages containing residual hazardous materials and perform all pre-transportation and transportation functions. Under this scenario, is the vendor, the manufacturing facility, or both, responsible for compliance with the HMR?

A1. Based on your description, the vendor performs all offeror and carrier functions and therefore is responsible for ensuring that the shipments conform to the requirements of the HMR. Specifically, an offeror is responsible for ensuring proper labeling and shipping papers under §§ 172.200, 172.204, and 172.400; and an offeror or carrier (when assigned the function) is responsible for markings and placards under §§ 172.300 and 172.500. Package manufacturers and those who perform requalification functions are responsible for the compliance of packagings; however the offeror must use and prepare the package correctly and ensure it is properly maintained. (See §§ 173.22, 178.2(a)(2), 178.601, 178.801(b), 180.3, and 180.205.)

Please note that if you perform any pre-transportation functions (as defined in § 171.8) related to the residue shipment, including securing the closure on a package, preparing a shipping paper, providing emergency response information, or certifying that a shipment is in proper condition for transportation in conformance with HMR requirements, you are responsible for compliance with the HMR.

Q2. Under the same scenario in Q1, if vendor personnel perform all pre-transportation functions but instead used a commercial carrier to transport the packages away from a manufacturing facility, is the answer the same?
A2. Yes, the answer is the same. As specified in § 171.2(a), each person who performs a function governed by the HMR must perform that function in accordance with the HMR. The fact that the carrier is commercial, private, or otherwise in this scenario is irrelevant.

Q3. Occasionally, vendor personnel will deliver packages of hazardous and non-hazardous materials intended for permanent on-site storage once connected to process equipment. As needed, the packages are refilled by vendor personnel on-site without disconnecting from the process equipment. For United Nations (UN) standard or Department of Transportation (DOT) specification packagings, is the vendor, the manufacturing facility, or both, responsible for compliance with the HMR (e.g., loading/unloading)?

A3. In the scenario you describe, the vendor is responsible for compliance with the HMR for functions it performs (e.g., loading/unloading, attendance). Conversely, under § 171.1(d)(3), the storage of a package containing a hazardous material after its delivery by a carrier to its destination is no longer subject to the requirements of the HMR. Further, any function (e.g., movement) performed exclusively within a contiguous facility boundary by the consignee, where public access is restricted, is not subject to the requirements of the HMR. However, please note that other regulations and standards of other Federal, state, and local agencies may apply. For example, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Regulations of the U.S. Department of Labor, at 29 CFR 1910.110, require DOT specification pressure vessels containing liquefied petroleum gas and used in the workplace to conform with the HMR.

Under § 171.2(g), no person may represent or offer a packaging as meeting the requirements of the HMR unless the packaging is maintained, marked, and retested in accordance with the applicable requirements of the HMR when transported in commerce. These requirements are applicable whether or not the packaging is used for the transportation of a hazardous material. Therefore, if the UN standard or DOT specification packaging used at the manufacturing facility is not maintained in accordance with the HMR, we recommend you securely cover any identifying marks or specification plates representing it as such.

Q4. When applicable, who is responsible for providing or retaining copies of a special permit governing packagings, the vendor or the manufacturing facility?

A4. In the scenario you describe, the vendor is responsible. In general, the holder of a special permit is required, by the terms of the permit, to retain a copy of it. Additionally, anyone acting under the special permit should have a copy in order to ensure compliance with its terms, in accordance with §§ 171.2 and 173.22a(b), and may be required to retain a copy under the terms of the special permit. As specified in § 171.2, it is an offeror (shipper) responsibility to comply with all applicable requirements of the HMR, including a special permit issued under the HMR. The offeror must ensure packagings used to transport hazardous materials are manufactured, assembled, and marked in accordance with any applicable special permit. (§ 173.22(a)(2)(v).) The offeror is also required to provide a copy of the special permit to a carrier, when the permit contains requirements relevant to the carrier. (§ 173.22a(c).)

Based on your description, the vendor is acting as the offeror and carrier and is therefore responsible for retaining and providing copies of relevant special permits. If the manufacturing facility is not the holder of the special permit, does not perform any activities authorized under the special permit, and does not act as the offeror or carrier of any shipments, then it is not responsible for retaining or providing copies of the permit.

I trust this satisfies your inquiry. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.

Sincerely,

 

T. Glenn Foster
Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

173.22a, 171.2, 171.1

Regulation Sections

Section Subject
171.1 Applicability of Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) to persons and functions
171.2 General requirements
173.22a Use of packagings authorized under special permits