USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Interpretation Response #05-0264 ([JFK International Airport] [Mr. James LoBello])

Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.

Interpretation Response Details

Response Publish Date:

Company Name: JFK International Airport

Individual Name: Mr. James LoBello

Location State: NY Country: US

View the Interpretation Document

Response text:

Aug 8, 2006

 

Mr. James LoBello                        Reference. No. 05-0264
Senior Manager, Lufthansa Cargo AG
Security & Risk Prevention, The Americas
JFK International Airport
Cargo Building 23, North Service Road
Jamaica, New York USA 11430

Dear Mr. LoBello:

This responds to your October 13, 2005 request for clarification on the applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) to air shipment of hazardous materials packaged in accordance with the International Civil Aviation Organizations (ICAO) Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air. Specifically, you ask whether hazardous materials shipments in compliance with the ICAO Technical Instructions aboard a Canadian-bound aircraft would be subject to criminal or civil penalties if the aircraft has to be diverted to the U.S.

You state your flights bound for a Canadian airport occasionally may have to be diverted, because of an in-flight emergency (mechanical, threat, weather, etc.). You ask if you would be in compliance if diverted into the U.S. airspace as long as the hazardous materials shipment is in compliance with the ICAO Technical Instructions.

The answer depends upon whether cargo is unloaded from or loaded onto the aircraft at the U.S. airport. As a practical matter, we would recognize the emergency nature of the diversion and not pursue any noncompliance with the HMR when the aircraft departs for the intended Canadian airport at the conclusion of the emergency. However, if new cargo is loaded onto the aircraft, or the cargo is unloaded for storage and then reloaded, we would require compliance with the requirements in Part 175 of the HMR. In addition, acceptance of hazardous materials packaged in accordance with the ICAO Technical Instructions for transport in and through the U.S. is authorized under § 171.11.

I hope this answers your inquiry.

Sincerely,

 

John A. Gale
Chief, Standards Development
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards

171.11, 175.5

Regulation Sections