USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Interpretation Response #05-0235R ([Huntsman] [Clifford W. Lester, MSPH, CIH, EMT’B, DGSA])

Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.

Interpretation Response Details

Response Publish Date:

Company Name: Huntsman

Individual Name: Clifford W. Lester, MSPH, CIH, EMT’B, DGSA

Location State: TX Country: US

View the Interpretation Document

Response text:

Jul 17, 2007

 

Clifford W. Lester, MSPH, CIH, EMT"B, DGSA      Reference No. 05-0235R
Hazardous Communication Specialist
Huntsman
10003 Woodloch Forest Drive
The Woodlands, TX 77380

Dear Mr. Lester:

This serves as a retraction of our June 7, 2006 (Ref. No. 05-0235) letter responding to your request for clarification on how to package and describe spent catalysts being transported to a facility for reclamation under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171- 180). In the scenario described in your letter, the catalysts meet the definitions of various hazard classes under the HMR, and your company enters the appropriate description for each material on a standard bill-of-lading. You also state the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has determined these materials are solid wastes under 40 CFR 261.1 (c) (1) and (c) (4), but does not require them to be manifested as hazardous waste. Upon further review, we find our previous responses to your questions were incorrect. Your paraphrased questions and the correct answers are specified below. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

Q1.      We currently use new UN standard drums to transport these spent catalysts to a facility for final reclamation because we interpret that the original drums do not conform to § 173.12(c) solely because these material do not meet the definition of a hazardous waste. Is our understanding correct?

Al.        Your understanding is not correct. As specified in the preamble of Docket HM-218D (68 FR 48563; August 14, 2003; pertinent pages enclosed), § 173.12(c) authorizes the reuse of packagings for shipments of all wastes, not just waste materials subject to EPA waste manifest requirements, to designated facilities. The preamble further states, "This includes shipments of spent/waste materials which are being returned to or shipped to an EPA licensed and certified Storage or Disposal facility, but are not subject to the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest requirements of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency."

Q2.      Is the term waste" as it is used in § 173.12(c) and 173.28 restricted to those materials meeting EPA"s definition of a hazardous waste?

A2.      The answer is no. See Al.

Q3.      Does a spent catalyst that is not an EPA-manifested waste being transported to a facility for reclamation qualify for inclusion in the exception to reuse the non-bulk packagings authorized for wastes under § 173.12(c).

A3.      Yes. See answer Al.

I hope this information is helpful.

Sincerely,

 

Hattie L. Mitchell, Chief
Regulatory Review and Reinvention
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards

Enclosure

173.12 (2), 173.28

Regulation Sections

Section Subject
173.12 Exceptions for shipment of waste materials
173.28 Reuse, reconditioning and remanufacture of packagings