USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Interpretation Response #05-0175 ([Kaivac, Inc.] [Mr. Bob Robinson, Sr.])

Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.

Interpretation Response Details

Response Publish Date:

Company Name: Kaivac, Inc.

Individual Name: Mr. Bob Robinson, Sr.

Location State: OH Country: US

View the Interpretation Document

Response text:

Guidance Relative to the Classification of Corrosive Materials

Based on recent revisions to the U.S. Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) of in vitro skin corrosion testing protocols, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration"s (PHMSA) Office of Hazardous Materials Safety is working to ensure that all information relevant to the use of such test methods is available immediately to stakeholders via its website.
The attached guidance issued in

 conjunction with a Final Rule published in the Federal Register on January 19, 2011 [76 FR 3308] under Docket No. PHMSA-2009-0126 (HM-215K) is the most currently available and is provided for the benefit of all concerned parties.

Section 173.137

Section 173.137 establishes test criteria and packing group assignments for Class 8 (corrosive) material. Since 1993, PHMSA has authorized under the terms of a special permit (i.e., DOT"SP 10904) an in vitro test method (available commercially as Corrositex®) as an alternative form of testing to that specified in the HMR, which is based on live animal test results, to determine the corrosivity of certain materials. Materials authorized for analysis using the alternative test method include acids (and their derivatives), acyl halides, alkylamines and polyalkylamines, bases, chlorosilanes, metal halides, and oxyhalides.

The UN COE recently recognized and adopted in vitro test methods in the UN Model Regulations as an alternative form of testing to that specified in OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals, Number 404, "Acute Dermal Irritation/ Corrosion." The following alternative in vitro test methods include OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals:

- No. 430, "In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Transcutaneous Elctrical Resistance Test (TER)" (2004);
- No. 431, "In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Human Skin Model Test" (2004); and
- No. 435, "In Vitro Membrane Barrier Test Method for Skin Corrosion" (2006).

A positive test result under in vitro methods 430 and 431 may be used to determine corrosivity for transportation purposes but cannot be used to determine the PG assignment. A negative result for corrosivity under in vitro methods 430 and 431 can preclude further testing to determine PG assignment using method 404, the current OECD Guideline involving in vivo testing, or method 435, the newly adopted OECD Guideline involving in vitro testing.

Based on the adoption of three new OECD guidelines for the in vitro testing of materials for corrosivity in the UN Model Regulations and through encouragement from PETA to adopt these new test methods in a petition for rulemaking (P"1550), we proposed to adopt such guidelines as matter incorporated by reference (IBR) in §§ 171.7 and 173.137 of the HMR.

In response to our proposal to incorporate several in vitro test methods for determination of corrosivity, PHMSA has received over 900 comments supporting the proposal, including a comment from PETA. We received no opposition. Therefore, we are adopting the OECD Guideline Test Nos. 430, 431, and 435, and revising Test No. 404 as proposed. Further, PETA urged PHMSA to facilitate access to DOT"SP 10904 through our Web site until such a time that this final rule becomes effective, and requested that PHMSA remove letters of interpretation that they believe recommend the use of in vivo testing even though alternative in vitro testing is available.

With regard to PETA"s additional requests, they are beyond the scope of this rulemaking. However, we note that in prior correspondence with PETA, PHMSA has indicated that information about DOT"SP 10904 can be obtained by entering "Corrositex" in the search feature of the PHMSA Office of Hazmat Safety Web site. Also, the special permit may be accessed by entering "10904" in the search feature on our special permits Web site or by conducting a group number search.

We agree with PETA that non-live animal testing should be used where available and encourage shippers to use the in vitro test methods to determine the classification of a material as corrosive and assignment of a packing group. We also remind shippers that historical data may also be used to classify a material in accordance with § 173.136(c). Thus, in this final rule we are revising § 173.136(a) to codify the authorization to use in vitro test methods and to highlight the availability of classifying a material based on historical data.

[01-0231, 08-0207, 02-0315, 01-0135, 05-0175, 05-0307]

Regulation Sections

Section Subject
173.137 Class 8-Assignment of packing group