USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Interpretation Response #CHI-04-005 ([USAF] [Maruren Lacey])

Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.

Interpretation Response Details

Response Publish Date:

Company Name: USAF

Individual Name: Maruren Lacey

Location State: TX Country: US

View the Interpretation Document

Response text:

Office of the Chief Counsel

Maruren (Mark) Lacey, 1 st Lt. USAF

Program Manager, NPTLOX System

311 HSW/YAMA

7980 Lindbergh Landing

Brooks City-Base, TX 78235-5119

Dear Lt. Lacey,

This responds to your June 9, 2004 e-mail concerning the applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulation (HMR), 49 CFR Parts 171-180 to US Air Force employees transporting hazardous materials, in government vehicles upon pubic highways.

In your e-mail you state that the US Air Force is requesting our written concurrence that hazardous materials transported by US Air Force military personnel on public roads for a noncommecial governmental purpose are not subject to HMR requirements.

RSPA's position concurs with the US Air Force's belief along the following general principals:

  1. The HMR do not apply to the US Air Force as a carrier unless it transports hazardous material in the furtherance of a commercial enterprise.
  2. Transportation is not in furtherance of a commerical enterprise if it is carried out by government personnel and for a government purpose. We conclude that:
  1. US Air Force military personnel are government personnel, but contractors for the US Air Force are not; and
  2. The scope of a governmental purpose is sometimes difficult to define in the abstract, but an activity likely to fall in this domain would be the transportation of liquid oxygen converters in cryogenic pressurized cylinders upon a public road as described in your e-mail.
  • The fact that transportation occurs on public roads is of no consquence since a Federal agency that transports hazardous materials for noncommercial purposes, using its own personnel, is not engaged in transportation in commerce regardless of whether the hazardous material is transported on public or private roadways.

    • The US Air Force, in performing the functions described in your e-mail using military personnel, not contractor employees, is subject to the Federal hazardous materials transportation law, 49 U.S.C. § § 5101-5127, and the HMR.

    I also refer you to the most recent index of formal and informal interpretations on this subject which can be found at out website http: //rspa-atty.dot.gov . Click on "Hazmat Interpretation Letters"; then, click on "Combined by Subject", at the bottom of the next screen; finally, scroll down to "Government Agencies-Transportation By" and view any one of the seven informal interpretations on this subject. This response will be added to this portion of the site.

    If you need any further information, you may contact me or Bob Kern, of my staff, at the above address, by telephone on 202-366-4400, or by fax on 202-366-7041.

    Sincerely,

    Joseph Solomey

    Assistant Chief Counsel for Hazardous Materials

    Safety and Emergency Transportation Law

    cc: Marvin S. Hsie, Maj. USAF, MSC, CHE

    Chief, Resource Management Healthcare Technologies

    c/o Elizabeth Hunnicutt

    Essex Cryogenics of MO., Inc.

    8007 Chivvis Drive

    St. Louis, MO 63123

    Regulation Sections

    Section Subject
    107.606 Exceptions