Interpretation Response #PI-83-018 ([Memo: Internal])
Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.
Interpretation Response Details
Response Publish Date:
Company Name: Memo: Internal
Individual Name:
Country: US
View the Interpretation Document
Response text:
Odorization of Gas, Section 192.625
James C. Thomas, chief
Southern Region, Pipeline Safety, DMt-16
Richard L. Beam, DMT-30
Robert L. Paullin, DMT-10
Your memorandum of September 14, 1983, indicates the need for further information to respond to my cases 1, 2 and 3.
Assume that the source line is transmission or non-rural gathering and that it is "legally unodorized" because it meets the provisions of either 192.625(b)(1) or (3) but not (b)(2). I trust this information will be sufficient to respond to cases 1, 2 and 3 which concern "one customer" pipelines.
If the type of ultimate consumer does influence your responses to cases 1, 2 and 3 (as suggested in your final paragraph), I request guidance as to how to distinguish between "large volume customer: and, for example, an industrial or farm tap customer.
Regulation Sections
| Section | Subject |
|---|---|
| 192.625 | Odorization of gas |