USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Interpretation Response #08-0286 ([Packaging Applications for Dangerous Goods, LLC] [Mr. David Gluntz])

Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.

Interpretation Response Details

Response Publish Date:

Company Name: Packaging Applications for Dangerous Goods, LLC

Individual Name: Mr. David Gluntz

Location State: OH Country: US

View the Interpretation Document

Response text:

February 4, 2009






Mr. David Gluntz

Packaging Applications for Dangerous Goods, LLC

3583 Blackbottom Court

Columbus, OH 43221-4501

Ref No. 08-0286

Dear Mr. Gluntz:

This responds to your November 24, 2008 email requesting clarification of the provisions in the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to intermediate bulk containers (IBCs). In your letter, you present two scenarios:

Scenario 1: If the specification markings on an IBC are destroyed, removed, or covered up, is the package still an IBC?

Response 1: Because the specification markings are destroyed, removed, or covered up, the packaging no longer meets the standards of an IBC in accordance with the HMR. The packaging in your scenario is a non-specification bulk packaging.

Scenario 2: The only specification marking on a packaging is a serial number. The serial number was traced back to a packaging manufacturer who states the packaging was manufactured as a United Nations (UN) standard IBC. Must the packaging, originally a UN standard IBC, be retested in accordance with § 180.352?

Response 2: The answer is no. The packaging in your scenario is not required to be retested in accordance with § 180.352. As required in § 180.352, each IBC constructed in accordance with a UN standard for which a test or inspection specified in paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2) and (b)(3) of

§ 180.352 is required may not be filled and offered for transportation or transported until the test or inspection has been successfully completed.

I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if you require additional assistance.

Sincerely,

Hattie L. Mitchell

Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention

Office of Hazardous Materials Standards

180.352

Regulation Sections