Interpretation Response #00-0360 ([Conway Transportation Services] [Mr. Robert Petrancosta])
Below is the interpretation response detail and a list of regulations sections applicable to this response.
Interpretation Response Details
Response Publish Date:
Company Name: Conway Transportation Services
Individual Name: Mr. Robert Petrancosta
Location State: MI Country: US
View the Interpretation Document
Response text:
January 26, 2001
Mr. Robert Petrancosta Ref. No. 00-0360
Director
Safety and Environmental Compliance
Conway Transportation Services
110 Parkland Plaza
Ann Arbor, MI 48103
Dear Mr. Petrancosta:
This is in response to your December 22, 2000, letter regarding the identification number marking requirements for poisonous by inhalation (PIH) materials as specified in § 172.313(c) of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically, you request guidance on determining which identification number to mark on a vehicle containing two different PIH materials in non-bulk packages in the same hazard zone with identical gross weights.
Section 172.313(c)(3)(i) requires a transport vehicle or freight container containing different PIH materials in non-bulk packages be marked with identification number of the material having the greatest aggregate gross weight. When two PIH materials have the same hazard zone and gross weight, either identification number marking may be used on the transport vehicle or freight container.
I hope this satisfies your request.
Sincerely,
Transportation Regulations Specialists
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
172.313
Regulation Sections
| Section | Subject |
|---|---|
| 172.313 | Poisonous hazardous materials |